40 F. high in St. Cloud on Saturday (average high is 56 F.)
64.1" snow so far in St. Cloud. 
85.3" snow so far this winter at MSP. 
4th snowiest winter on record in the Twin Cities metro area.
3.7" required for this to be the 3rd snowiest winter on record in the Twin Cities.
Snowfall Reports from Friday night's storm:
4.5" Farmington (Dakota County)
4.5" River Falls, Wisconsin
3.5" Londsdale (Rice County)
3.3" Hastings
2.9" Hamburg (Carver County)
2.4" Inver Grove Heights
1" Downtown St. Paul
.2" St. Cloud
What Month Is This Again? Weather spotter Rich  Koivisto captured this photo from his yard Saturday morning. Officially  3.2" fell on downtown Duluth, but higher amounts were observed from the  Iron Range to the North Shore of Lake Superior.
Snowfall Reports Up North. 8" was reported at Chisholm, 5" at Tower and 4" at Ely. Click 
here to see all the snowfall totals, courtesy of NOAA.
4th Snowiest Winter On Record. It's official - we  just endured the 4th snowiest winter in modern-day records, since 1891.  So far: 85.3" of snow has fallen - more appears imminent by Tuesday  night and Wednesday morning.
April Snowmobiling. Check out all the new snow on the ground as of early Saturday, courtesy of NOAA and 
weatherstreet.com. 2-4" was on the ground north/west of St. Cloud, with some 4-6"+ amounts over northcentral and northeastern Minnesota.
(Almost) Censored For Your Mental Health. I hesitated before sharing this with you. I do not want to ruin your Sunday. 
The GFS has been notoriously unreliable in recent weeks.  So why am I sharing this with you? First of all, I'm not sure I want to  get into the habit of withholding information. Secondly, I'm covering  my butt, just in case we're knee-deep in slush by Wednesday morning and  Minnesotans are shouting "there was no warning!" Do I think we'll get a  foot of snow? No, but "a few inches" seems realistic late Tuesday into  Wednesday morning, with a 1 in 3 chance of a plowable snowfall. Yes, I  hope the GFS solution is wrong. But one of these storms the law of  averages will catch up with us. Somehow I think we have one more  (significant) snowfall brewing before we finally make a turn into a  sustainable spring pattern.
NAM Solution. I suspect the 00z NAM solution will  wind up being a little closer to reality, still hinting at 2-4" slush  for the Twin Cities metro, less over central Minnesota. A band of 6-10"  is predicted over far southeastern Minnesota. Good grief. Some spring...
Snowy Trends. The models agree on the timing of the  next storms (late Tuesday through midday Wednesday), but not the  amounts. The range: 4-14", give or take a foot. Throw out the highest  and lowest values and you still wind up with a midrange prediction in  the 4"+ range. We'll see. It's still (very) early to be attaching  inch-amounts to the forecast. Could it be "plowable"? Absolutely.
NAM Numbers. The 00z NAM is predicting 1.62" liquid  by Wednesday morning, with 850-1000 mb temperature averages cold enough  for mostly snow by Tuesday night and Wednesday morning. We'll see - the  models WILL change as new data initializes the simulations, as newer,  better, more accurate data is factored into the model runs as we get  closer to the actual storm event.
"Cobb Method". Using 00z NAM numbers one of the more  reliable conversation techniques suggests 9.9" snow by Wednesday  morning for the Twin Cities (even more for St. Cloud). I still think this is on the high side. I PRAY it's on the high  side. I want to see a few more runs, see if there is any continuity  from run to run, any consistency between the various models (which  increases our comfort level). It's still too early to panic (or  celebrate). Even the most hard-core snow lovers are probably ready to  turn the page right about now.
Storm Track. The models are fairly consistent in  printing out a projected storm track well south of Minnesota (keeping us  on the cold, northern side of this intense area of low pressure). The  storm is predicted to be centered west of Kansas City within 72 hours,  by Tuesday morning.
Midnight Tuesday Night. The 00z NAM solution shows a  strong storm over northwestern Illinois by midnight Tuesday night, a  broad shield of moderate to heavy snow stretching from central MInnesota  into northern Wisconsin.
Hope. After we muddle through an unseasonably cold,  stormy, potentially snowy week, models show a significant warming trend  after Monday, April 25, a streak of 60s, even a shot at 70 by May 1.  Wouldn't that be nice! This is 3 days/row that the GFS has been hinting  at a real shift in the pattern by the last week of April - I think it's  real. We're going to need a real warm front soon.
Massive Multi-Vortex Wedge From Oklahoma. This is some of the most spectacular tornado video I've ever seen, courtesy of 
tornadovideos.net: "
Storm  chasers/meteorologists Marc Austin, Robert McIntyre and Gabe  Garfield  documented and reported this violent multi-vortex tornado that  struck  areas in and around Tushka and Atoka, Oklahoma on April 14, 2011.  They  ultimately abandoned the chase to assist with first responders.   Sadly,  extensive damage resulted in these communities, and at least two   fatality has been confirmed, along with a number of injuries."
 
An Historic Day For North Carolina.  At last report at least 80 tornadoes swept across North Carolina  yesterday, setting a new statewide record for twisters in one day.
 
Aftermath. The tornadoes that tore into the Raleigh,  North Carolina were especially violent and long-lived, possible EF-3  strength. At least 3 deaths were reported in the Raleigh area, but is  expected to rise as first responders sift through the rubble. The  Atlanta Journal Constitution is reporting a death toll of 24 in North  Carolina and Virginia, more details 
here.
Super-Storm. Here is what Friday's deadly tornado  outbreak looked like from space, courtesy of NOAA's GOES weather  satellite. Jeff Masters has a summary of the outbreak (100 tornadoes in  one day on Friday) in his 
Wunderblog: 
"Dozens  of tornadoes and dangerous  severe thunderstorms tore through the  Southeast U.S. on Friday,  bringing a second day of severe weather havoc  to the nation. The death  toll from the two-day severe blitz now stands  at seventeen, with up to  100 people injured and tens of millions of  dollars in property damage.  NOAA's Storm Prediction Center   logged 98 tornado reports yesterday, bringing the two-day total for  the  outbreak to 120 tornadoes. These preliminary reports are usually a  15%  over-count of the actual number of tornadoes, which still means  over 100  tornadoes have probably touched down during the past two days.  The  deadliest tornado of the outbreak hit near Prattville, Alabama   at 10:55pm CDT last night, killing three people in a mobile home, and   injuring four others. One of the most damaging tornadoes occurred just   west of Jackson, Mississippi, when a tornado touched down just south of   I-20, crossed the expressway, flipping cars and semis, then plowed   through the town of Clinton. At least nine people were injured in   Clinton, and extensive damage characteristic of an EF-2 tornado is   apparent in damage photos."
Hyper-Active Storm Pattern. Fred Allen from Earth Networks has an incredible storm summary from April 14-16:
Total # of Tornadoes: 214
Total # of Wind Reports: 360
Total # of Large Hail Reports: 341
Overall # of Severe Weather Incidents Since Thursday: 915
Why You Don't Want To Be In A Mobile Home During A Tornado.  Winds as low as 80-90 mph can cause a mobile home to lift up off the  ground. An estimated 30-40% of all tornado fatalities are people in  mobile home parks who aren't able to reach an underground shelter in  time. Here's a 
recap of one such tragedy in Alabama on Friday from MSNBC: "
Only  stairs and flowers remain Saturday, April 16, 2011 after severe  winds  tore a mobile home off it's lot late Friday night in Boone's  Chapel,  Ala., in Autauga County. Vicious storms and howling winds  smacked the  Deep South, killing at least seven people in Alabama  including three  family members whose homes were tossed into nearby  woods."
Live Coverage. Local TV stations did a good job  yesterday providing blow by blow accounts of the tornadic storms roaring  across North Carolina. The live Doppler image above was from WRAL-TV,  which was streaming the outbreak live on the web. Note the classic hook  echo just northwest of the town of Wade, a severe, rotating "supercell"  thunderstorm.
Doppler Reflectivity. The radar beam (.5 degrees  above the horizon) reflects (scatters) off of raindrops and hailstones,  sending back a real-time snapshot of the storm, showing heaviest rain  and hail, and the classic, "6" shape of a hook echo. This is the  supercell that spawned a deadly "family" of tornadoes just south of  Raleigh, North Carolina.
Velocity Field. Doppler radar is so sensitive it can  determine whether a "target" (raindrop or hailstone) is moving toward,  or away from the radar site - using algorithms the radar system can  detect areas of strong rotation - this is where tornadoes are most  likely to develop.
Rotation. Using a powerful analysis tool, GR2  Analyst, meteorologists were able to determine that intense rotation in  the mid-levels of the atmosphere extended all the way to the ground,  increasing confidence that tornadic circulation was, in fact, on the  ground. This is a great tool, but no replacement for law enforcement and  professionally trained SKYWARN spotters, able to confirm that rotation  is spinning up an actual wall cloud, funnel or tornado.
"
Couplet". Here is another stark example of what a  tornadic "supercell" thunderstorm looks like on Doppler radar. The  bright red sploch shows rain drops and hailstones moving away from the  Doppler radar at high velocity, the light green/blue shades depict air  racing toward the radar site. You can infer violent rotation at the  intersection of those 2 colors - this iis where the tornado south of  Raleigh was located. Check out more images from 
texasstormchasers.com.

How A Fukushima-Level Disaster Might Impact New York, Chicago or Los Angeles. How might a nuclear disaster near one of America's largest urban centers play out? Gizmodo runs the scenarios in 
this article: "
The  Japanese government has expanded the long-term evacuation radius   around the Fukushima nuclear plant to 30 kilometers (18.6 miles). The   United States government is still asking to all their citizens inside an   80-kilometer radius to leave. That's almost 50 miles. If the  federal government followed the same policy in US soil, these  would be  the consequences in the three most populated cities: New York,  LA and  Chicago. The maps show the nuclear power plants closest to these cities.  In  the case of New York, more than 20 million people in the metro area   would have to be evacuated, leaving the city deserted, from Long  Island  to the Bronx. If there were a Fukushima-level accident at Indian  Point,  including the release of massive quantities of highly  radioactive water,  the city would be even more affected because of the  Hudson River."
  

! Have you  noticed this? You're carring on a civil conversation and all of a sudden  the person you're having a "chat" with whips out their iPhone or  Android trinket and starts banging away, glancing up at you with one  eye. "Hey, I'm multi-tasking!" O.K. Excuse me while I walk away. Here's a  good 
encapsulation of today's lack of electronic etiquette from the New York Times: "
You  are at a party and the person in front of you is not really  listening  to you. Yes, she is murmuring occasional assent to your  remarks, or  nodding at appropriate junctures, but for the most part she  is looking  beyond you, scanning in search of something or someone more  compelling.  Here’s the funny part: If she is looking over your shoulder at a room   full of potentially more interesting people, she is ill-mannered. If,   however, she is not looking over your shoulder, but into a smartphone in   her hand, she is not only well within modern social norms, but is also  a  wired, well-put-together person. Add one more achievement to the  digital revolution: It has made it fashionable to be rude."
I Sat On A $6,400 Toilet Seat, And It Changed My Life.  O.K. This is definitely over the top, and I think it's ridiculous to  spend that kind of money on a toilet...unless it came with a portable  stand for my iPad2, maybe a small HDTV attachment, possibly a small,  portable 'fridge? No - this is wrong. Gizmodo.com has the decadent  story: "
Let's get one thing straight—Kohler's Numi toilet isn't for  you.  Unless you're a Saudi oil sheik, lottery winner, or generally  filthy  rich person, you won't consider a toilet that costs half a  year's rent.  But it's spectacular. The Numi sticks every conceivable  luxury into one pisser. Things you didn't even think you needed—and  things you definitely don't  need—a foot warmer, radio,  auxiliary audio input, ambient lights. And  all controlled by a  touchscreen mini-tablet with a 20 foot range. Why  would you ever need  to control your toilet from 20 feet away brings up a  series of  nightmare scenarios that are hard for me to express right  now, but good  to know, just in case. But beyond the decadence, there's some really  great design ($6,400's  worth, I'm not so sure, but still). A motion  detector, indicated by a  blue spotlight, allows you to raise and lower  the seat with a foot-tap—a  victory for all of lazy mankind."
Raw Saturday. If felt more like March 16 out there  yesterday with a gray sky spitting a few snow flurries. Highs ranged  from a chilling 31 at International Falls (digging out from nearly 6" of  snow) to 
40 at St. Cloud, 41 in the Twin Cities.
 Paul's SC Times Outlook for St. Cloud and all of central Minnesota:
TODAY
Paul's SC Times Outlook for St. Cloud and all of central Minnesota:
TODAY: Intervals of sun, less wind. It will almost feel like spring. Winds: NW 7-12. High: 47 
SUNDAY NIGHT: Partly cloudy, chilly. Low: 31
MONDAY: Mostly cloudy - still dry. High: 45
TUESDAY: Rain develops, changes to wet snow. Snow may continue Tuesday night. Low: 35. High: 40
WEDNESDAY: Wet snow tapers. A few inches possible. Low: 29. High: 41
THURSDAY: Clouds increase, a cold rain late? Low: 31. High: 48 
FRIDAY: More rain possible (wet snow up north?) Low: 34. High: 43
SATURDAY: Showers taper, slow clearing, still unseasonably cool. Low: 31. High: 46
Weather Therapy
"The Earth experienced the 13th warmest March  since record keeping began in 1880, as the climate phenomenon La NiƱa  continued to be a significant factor. The annual maximum Arctic sea ice  extent was reached on March 7 and tied with 2006 as the smallest annual  maximum extent since record keeping began in 1979", said a recent NOAA  release. La Nina springs tend to be volatile: on Friday 100 tornadoes  were observed from Illinois to Alabama. The trends are obvious: it's  turning into a deadly and violent spring for much of America. I just  can't envision a scenario where Minnesota would see more tornadoes than  last year (a nation-leading 113.) But with imminent warmth &  humidity will come a growing severe risk from late April into May. As  much as we dread the slush and wind chill, at least we're not spending  quality time hiding in our basements.
It's now the 4th snowiest winter season on  record; a few of the models are hinting at a major snow Wednesday, but  the more reliable ECMWF solution kills the storm; whisks it east. Hope  it's right. Not sure how much more snow we can take before demonstrators  take to the streets.
I see a run of 60s after April 26. Keep the faith.

Arctic Temperatures Off The Scale. A good summary of Arctic temperature trends 
here: "
Warmer  than average temperatures prevailed across much of the planet  in  March, especially in the far north, where readings were so high that   climatologists had to add a new color — hot pink — to their maps.  Overall, the combined global land and ocean surface temperature was   0.88 degrees above the 20th century average, making it the 35   consecutive March with above-average temperatures and the 13th-warmest   March on record, according to the monthly summary from the National Climatic Data Center.  For the year to-date, global temperatures are running 0.77 degrees   above average, making it the 14th warmest January-March period on   record. Warmer-than-average ocean conditions were  most pronounced in the  equatorial Atlantic, the western Pacific oceans,  and across the Southern  Hemisphere midlatitudes. Across the planet’s  land masses, the most prominent warmth was  recorded across most of  Siberia, southwestern Greenland, southern North  America, and most of  Africa. Cooler-than-average conditions were  reported from the western  half of Canada, most of Mongolia, China and  southeastern Asia. A  notable exception to global warmth was in  Australia, which experienced  its coolest March on record, with above  average rainfall across the  entire country." 

. The Montreal Gazette 
examines life in a world that is 2 degree Celsius warmer than today: "
Not  that he or anyone else wants to see the Earth's average temperature  climb by 2 degrees Celsius. Wet  places would get wetter. Extreme  weather would be more extreme. Dry  spots would be plagued by drought,  and some crops would fail. Nine  out of 10 summers would be hotter than  the hottest summer in the last  20 years. There would be more forest  fires. Sea ice would melt, coral  reefs would be in peril. Birds,  animals and plants unable to adapt or  migrate to cooler terrain would  risk extinction. Yet geographers,  environmental scientists, urban  planners, climatologists - people like  Matthews who spend their days  worrying about what has already happened  to the planet and what's  likely to occur if we keep pumping greenhouse  gases into the atmosphere  - have begun to see containment as their last,  best hope."
The Key To Sustainability. Chairman of the  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Rajendra Pachauri,  addressed an audience at the University of Delaware, sharing potential  solutions to the problem of climate change. Here is an excerpt of his 
remarks: "
Addressing  charges by climate change skeptics that the observed  increases in the  surface temperature of the Earth could be the result of  natural  variations, Pachauri referred to a graph depicting the range of   predictions by climate models that include both natural and human   forcing mechanisms or natural mechanisms alone. “Natural factors such as  solar activity and volcanic activity don’t  fully explain what has  happened to temperature increases over the past  100 years or so,”  Pachauri said. “However, when we include inputs  related to increases in  the concentrations of greenhouse gases, what we  get is almost a  perfect fit between model predictions and actual  observations.”  Pachauri also reviewed the expected impacts of climate change on human  societies in the coming century. “For thousands of years, human  societies have been based on a steady  supply of water from seasonal  melting of glaciers,” he said. The  reduction of ice stored in glaciers  is now expected to place numerous  societies at increased risk of water  stress and conflict based on  shrinking water supplies for drinking and  irrigation. Other effects include sea-level rise, which threatens to  displace  many millions of people who live in low-lying river deltas  around the  world, including the Nile, Ganges and Mekong deltas.  Pachauri emphasized  that the worst impacts would likely be experienced  by the populations  with the fewest resources available to adapt to  change. “Climate change will have an impact not only on future  generations, but on this generation,” he said."
China Willing To Join U.S. In Climate Change Conversation. Here's an 
article from takepart.com: "
Speaker  of the House Nancy Pelosi has been overseas in China as of  late,  trying to get the nation with whom we rarely agree to engage with  the  United States on the topic of climate change. And, lo and behold, it   looks like it may be working. The Premier of China, Wen Jiabao, says   that China is ready to join the dialogue on climate change.  From Terra Daily: "China will cement policy dialogue with the United  States, take  the joint tackling of climate change as an important  aspect of  cooperation and push for positive results in the Copenhagen  Climate  Change Conference," Xinhua news agency quoted Wen as saying.  This is pretty exciting stuff, as China has resisted multi-lateral   attempts to discuss climate change and was not bound by the Kyoto   protocol, which the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference will attempt to   replace. Pelosi, for her part, said (prior to Premier Wen's statement)   that China joining a discussion on climate change could have great implications for U.S./China relations."
 
No comments:
Post a Comment